imagwai
·Aimed at people who are ambidextrous, or just indecisive?
Okay, so what I don't understand is why the 'enthusiasts' think a watch paying tribute to an 'enthusiast's' watch should automatically be produced to sell to the enthusiasts? I don't think that is the point at all. Because the 'enthusiasts' will pick fault with every little detail and it will never be what they actually want (which is, basically the original), so the target market is actually not the 'enthusiasts', but (for want of a better word) 'non-enthusiasts' who can be manipulated by the back story and marketing BS.
Okay, so what I don't understand is why the 'enthusiasts' think a watch paying tribute to an 'enthusiast's' watch should automatically be produced to sell to the enthusiasts? I don't think that is the point at all. Because the 'enthusiasts' will pick fault with every little detail and it will never be what they actually want (which is, basically the original), so the target market is actually not the 'enthusiasts', but (for want of a better word) 'non-enthusiasts' who can be manipulated by the back story and marketing BS.
why does Omega outsell TAG Heuer by a large margin
Not everything, or automatically. But would be nice if TAG sometimes did something to appeal to Heuer enthusiasts. The closest they came was the Carrera reissue in the 1990s - most agree this is a near perfect reissue. Getting the enthusiasts on side can have a trickle-down effect onto the mass market as well. The problem for TAG is that it doesn't think it can be "avant garde" and celebrate it's history at the same time.
On the other hand, one might question how come they could make these low volume things at reasonable prices back then but not now? Or were they excessively expensive back then too?