I think the naked eye could probably discern the difference in the weight of the lines overall. Just conjecture.
By including a loupe Omega is inviting closer inspection, nominally so you can view the movement better, but now many owners are louping the dial and seeing the differences. Most people feel the movement looks the same across all examples, so why should there be a fairly wide divergence in the dials? They should be consistent, imo. But that is why we have 27 pages of discussion so far.
Pretty much this. The foot line or lack thereof can generally be discerned with the naked eye, otherwise, line weights will make the stamping appear overall thinner or thicker (with the thinnest examples looking notably very weak).
This. I got the call for the Snoopy, but sadly it wasn’t the thick dial. All lines were here but it looks so thin you can definitely tell the difference with the thicker Snoopy, it is really night and day. Also I think Omega will not replace it since all lines are here
I think I’ll pass, almost 12k for not being fully happy with the watch is a no go for me.
I dunno, that dial doesn't look bad. It all depends on how it looks in person, and only you can make that judgment.
Eh, why? Investment potential?
If ADs who may be losing their franchise are getting them the market may be saturated now. Omega, stop producing them, it's over.