EmJay
·Own software of the non software company is the dead end at the beginning. Even Tizen failed. Here there is no chance whatsoever.
WearOS smartwatches (like the Google Pixel Watch, Samsung Galaxy Watch, etc.) can generally be paired with iPhones.
However, functionality is significantly more limited than when used with Android smartphones.
Some features don't work or only work to a limited extent (e.g., app installations, notifications, Google Assistant functions).
So, it's pretty much the same as it is now with its own OS... except for the notifications.
For Android users, E5 is just a nice luxury gadget with the functionality of 15 years ago.
If the E5 had been based on WearOS, chances are it would have been based on the latest WearOS version, and a similar firmware would have worked on the E4.
Now the E4 will be stuck on 3.2 forever.
This will prove to be a strategic blow to the neck, I bet.
According customer care no third party apps allowed. No Google account either.
That's what they told me 4hrs ago..maybe the guy didn't know any better 😉
If the E5 had been based on Wear OS, it would have lost its ability to connect to iPhone.
Sad but true...
I remember times, when Google were the open-minded good guys 😬
But in this case they still are... I'm pretty sure that Google would love to be able to support iPhone and eat some of Apple Watch's market share. The problem is that they supported iOS from 2015 until 2022 and they won zero market share, because of Apple always blocking the ability of Wear OS to play nice with iPhones. The vast majority of iPhone users never showed interest in Wear OS watches, either because of their forced limited functionality, or because of brand loyalty. Maybe the TAG Heuer Connected was an exception, but a luxury smartwatch has almost by definition an extremely limited market share, insignificant to Google. In the end Google cannot support forever a feature that is rendered useless.
Apple is the real villain in this story and they even face lawsuits about their limiting strategy both from the DoJ in the US and the EU.
"According to TAG Heuer, around 70% of its smartwatch users pair their devices with iPhones." (https://www.macrumors.com/2025/10/08/new-tag-heuer-smartwatches-now-made-for-iphone/).
Looks like my 80% guess was pretty close since there's probably a fair number of Apple users that never bought because of poor iPhone integration. Actually, this 70% is much higher than I would have thought... I was thinking about the potential market, not the actual market.
Anyway, with this stat, it's easy to understand why they did it. Who wants to walk away from 70% of their users?
To that end, and considering that the WatchMaker app can't be installed on the E5, it would be essential for its watch faces to have a fully detailed, full-colour dim mode (at least with that option in the settings, accepting that it would increase battery consumption somewhat).
My thoughts exactly. I can't see any reviews mentioning this yet.
I cannot find anything about AoD in settings. Some faces keep colors in AoD, others go mostly black and white.
Very few options in settings, very simple OS. Back to early days of smartwatches.
I have selected Fahrenheit in settings, weather widget shows Fahrenheit, complication shows Celsius. Tried the watch to track treadmill session, worked well during it (similar to E4), synced session details (duration, steps, calories heart rate) with phone app, then watch crashed and restarted. After restart steps on watch were down to zero, even after an hour of being connected to the phone.
Too soon to talk about battery, but it seems to be better than E4. Screen is beautiful.
Wow, thanks for this first hand impressions... Not that positive...
What APPs are there? Navi? Email? Calendar? Calculator?