2000 professional

Posts
535
Likes
1,501
Out of curiosity I've been trying to date my wife's 962.213.
We have no box or papers and there isn't a serial number on the caseback.
This reference number was released in 1983, I believe, but as a Heuer, and not Tag Heuer.
Anyone any ideas ?

 
Posts
768
Likes
1,009
Probably late 80s/early 90s - they switched to current reference scheme in '94 IIRC, and mid-80s ones were likely to have Heuer casebacks.

Not my area of expertise, however. @TAG1000Diver.com is the one to ask.
 
Posts
535
Likes
1,501
Probably late 80s/early 90s - they switched to current reference scheme in '94 IIRC, and mid-80s ones were likely to have Heuer casebacks.

Not my area of expertise, however. @TAG1000Diver.com is the one to ask.
Cheers 馃憤
I'm thinking '91ish, but I'm only surmising
 
Posts
309
Likes
693
The 2000 text on the dial was discontinued in 1990 but I would think some were sold within 1990 and beyond.
Your watch was made 1986-1989, possibly early 1990.
The 6-digit numbering system ended in 1992.
 
Posts
535
Likes
1,501
The 2000 text on the dial was discontinued in 1990 but I would think some were sold within 1990 and beyond.
Your watch was made 1986-1989, possibly early 1990.
The 6-digit numbering system ended in 1992.
Great stuff 鈽猴笍 thanks for that
 
Posts
9,418
Likes
19,283
Out of curiosity I've been trying to date my wife's 962.213.
We have no box or papers and there isn't a serial number on the caseback.
This reference number was released in 1983, I believe, but as a Heuer, and not Tag Heuer.
Anyone any ideas ?

The 2000 text on the dial was discontinued in 1990 but I would think some were sold within 1990 and beyond.
Your watch was made 1986-1989, possibly early 1990.
The 6-digit numbering system ended in 1992.
I bought my 2000 on Feb 1990, it still has 2000 on the dial. But it was probably produced in '89 (or earlier).

Mine also has a 'polished' case-back cover, which is consistent with many TAG Heuer models produced in the '80s. (My '85-ish Heuer 1000 also has a polished case-back cover.) But I notice @Turpinrr's wife's 2000 has a 'matte' case-back cover, which is more consistent with the models produced in the early '90s.

Hence, I would guess hers might've been manufactured right around 1990, I doubt it was mid-80s due to the case-back. Perhaps a hybrid of the older style dial and the newer style 'matte' case-back cover.
 
Posts
535
Likes
1,501
I bought my 2000 on Feb 1990, it still has 2000 on the dial. But it was probably produced in '89 (or earlier).

Mine also has a 'polished' case-back cover, which is consistent with many TAG Heuer models produced in the '80s. (My '85-ish Heuer 1000 also has a polished case-back cover.) But I notice @Turpinrr's wife's 2000 has a 'matte' case-back cover, which is more consistent with the models produced in the early '90s.

Hence, I would guess hers might've been manufactured right around 1990, I doubt it was mid-80s due to the case-back. Perhaps a hybrid of the older style dial and the newer style 'matte' case-back cover.
Has yours got the 3 lines of font on the dial ?

I bought it for myself originally but found it a bit on the small side probably due to the small dial.

But, it's her go-to watch, that gets more wear than her more expensive pieces.
 
Posts
9,418
Likes
19,283
Has yours got the 3 lines of font on the dial ?

I bought it for myself originally but found it a bit on the small side probably due to the small dial.

But, it's her go-to watch, that gets more wear than her more expensive pieces.
Yes
 
Posts
342
Likes
538
Probably late 80s/early 90s - they switched to current reference scheme in '94 IIRC, and mid-80s ones were likely to have Heuer casebacks.

Not my area of expertise, however. @TAG1000Diver.com is the one to ask.

That does make sense! My parents bought me my classic 2000 in 1996. The box states the model number as a 962.006, but the model number on the caseback is WE1110-2. I figured my watch was a "transition" piece considering the differing model codes on the caseback vs. the box. Also, TAG Heuer updated the 2000 series in 1995 with the some subtle changes (adding a "12" on the dial and changing bezel shape from round to angular).

And a pic for fun...

 
Posts
8
Likes
4
Literally have a "classic" 2000 professional from the same era. Purchased 1995, silver face, white date dial. By mid-1990s, they had moved away from the older model number system XXX.XXX in favor of the W+1111-r system although they were still using older-style dials with lume-only face without the "12" above the bi-colored logo. But it's quite possible they had some of the older boxes with old numbering system. They started using new "12" lume face a year or two later. I've been looking for a matching 962.006r in the classic matte black face and matching black date dial. Some day....

 
Posts
56
Likes
374
The production year (and quarter, of the movement) is on the movement for all these watches, right? Easy to date once you take the caseback off!
 
Posts
482
Likes
872
The production year (and quarter, of the movement) is on the movement for all these watches, right? Easy to date once you take the caseback off!
I think that gives a ballpark area but probably not specific to assembly date.
The movements were probably stamped when they came on to TH stock rather than when the watch was assembled.
Hard to be sure that they have the original movement as well, so many movement swaps take place and the coil guards don't always get swapped over.
 
Posts
535
Likes
1,501
I think that gives a ballpark area but probably not specific to assembly date.
The movements were probably stamped when they came on to TH stock rather than when the watch was assembled.
Hard to be sure that they have the original movement as well, so many movement swaps take place and the coil guards don't always get swapped over.
In what sort of format is it stamped and whereabouts ?
I can't find any pics for reference 馃

I've got at least one other watch with this movement
Edited:
 
Posts
482
Likes
872
On gents it's stamped on the coil guard, it's not engraved just a black ink stamp.
Format is : "Tag Heuer 4.88" for example.
On womens size its usually inked on the train wheel bridge I think.
 
Posts
8
Likes
4
One thing I've often wondered is what extend TH would use up existing stock of bezels and watch faces when transitioning from the older model numbers (ie. 962.006) to the WE.... series to eventually the WK series. For example, sometimes you'll see an older model WE1110-R with a black date dial disk. Did they use up what they had from the 962.XXX before transitiong to new white date wheel? Or was this done by an owner during a refurb? I've also seen very early WK marked cases, but with the circular bezels like you see on the older WE....models before they switched over completely to the newly designed angular bezel. All these things can be used to approximate a date of manufacture (as you guys say), like the quartz movement, but it not exactly precise. You can get to within a couple of years (1992-93 for instance). Bought this last week for $375, thought it was a decent deal (especially now with new 39% import duties driving the USA domestic previously owned prices and gray market higher). Seller described as like new and only worn about a dozen times before laid down in safe for decades. Literally not a scratch on it and in a remarkable state of preservation with full bracelet intact and model # and serial # crisp. Only sign of age is the patina on the hands as it was stored with crown open which I suspect allowed air/humidity in and some of the black color in the bezel numbers in light. I guess you'd call it a barn find...

 
Posts
482
Likes
872
One thing I've often wondered is what extend TH would use up existing stock of bezels and watch faces when transitioning from the older model numbers (ie. 962.006) to the WE.... series to eventually the WK series. For example, sometimes you'll see an older model WE1110-R with a black date dial disk. Did they use up what they had from the 962.XXX before transitiong to new white date wheel? Or was this done by an owner during a refurb? I've also seen very early WK marked cases, but with the circular bezels like you see on the older WE....models before they switched over completely to the newly designed angular bezel. All these things can be used to approximate a date of manufacture (as you guys say), like the quartz movement, but it not exactly precise. You can get to within a couple of years (1992-93 for instance). Bought this last week for $375, thought it was a decent deal (especially now with new 39% import duties driving the USA domestic previously owned prices and gray market higher). Seller described as like new and only worn about a dozen times before laid down in safe for decades. Literally not a scratch on it and in a remarkable state of preservation with full bracelet intact and model # and serial # crisp. Only sign of age is the patina on the hands as it was stored with crown open which I suspect allowed air/humidity in and some of the black color in the bezel numbers in light. I guess you'd call it a barn find...

Well known that they used up Heuer branded parts post takeover, mixing them with newly produced Tag Heuer branded components.
I'm working on an early TH branded "Moondust" 2000 currently, it has a Heuer crown and bracelet but a TH dial and caseback.
Probably no reason to doubt they would continue in the same pragmatic vein in later years. I would guess they would use up a certain proportion of existing parts and hold some back for future service/repair work.

Looks a nice find, such good watches for the money.
 
Posts
535
Likes
1,501

This is the pic of my movement showing it's date on the coil cover.
Thanks everybody peeps 馃憤
 
Posts
482
Likes
872

This is the pic of my movement showing it's date on the coil cover.
Thanks everybody peeps 馃憤
馃ぃ Exactly the same date as the example pic I put up, weird!
Must have been right at the tail end of the "2000" on the dial.
Looks nice and clean under the hood 馃憤