Would this bother you? Service Centre experience.

YVR785
Posts
228
Likes
214
R Richard_C
Really? You think you might look at the watch and say hey - its 2 minutes past something not 12? Still very fit for purpose.
I never said it wasn’t. I’m okay with an hour hand misalignment unless it’s more than 2 minutes.

And yes, it would be 2 minutes past something that’s not 12. Here’s an example I found online (not my watch/photo):
IMG_8429.webp

If you want to get all technical about it, it’s 5:01 o’clock. The hour hand hasn’t passed the 6 index. Maybe I’m being slightly facetious (only slightly).
 
R
Posts
10
Likes
15
Yep, sorry. I misread. You never said it wasn't fit for purpose. You said ....… kind of defeats the whole purpose.... I've just looked down my electron microscope with its semantic hair splitting attachment and now admit that it has has a completely different meaning from not fit for purpose.

My mistake.
 
Dan S
Posts
23,127
Likes
51,629
YVR785 YVR785
I never said it wasn’t. I’m okay with an hour hand misalignment unless it’s more than 2 minutes.

And yes, it would be 2 minutes past something that’s not 12. Here’s an example I found online (not my watch/photo):
IMG_8429.webp

If you want to get all technical about it, it’s 5:01 o’clock. The hour hand hasn’t passed the 6 index. Maybe I’m being slightly facetious (only slightly).
Yeah, that defeats the whole purpose, I have no idea what time that watch is showing. 🤪
 
Sign up or log in to reply...