The Uncommon Two-Tone Globemaster 2652 with Arrowhead Markers: What I Learned and My New Arrival

Posts
936
Likes
3,793
Hello fellow members of Omegaforums,

Today, I would like to share my findings on this uncommon “no-name” Constellation, also referred to as the “Globemaster”. This model was produced exclusively for the U.S. market, and due to copyright issues at the time, the word “Constellation” was omitted from the dial.



For background reading, here is Desmond’s excellent article on the subject:
http://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.hk/2006/08/globemaster-son-of-constellation.html?m=1
https://download1648.mediafire.com/...NE2oKrXIw/r6z1f6wcg9qeqfg/Globemasterpost.pdf

From my research, this “no-name” Constellation appears only in gold-cap and 18k solid gold cases. Based on discussions with several collectors and experts, there are no confirmed examples in stainless steel, and no original black dial versions have been observed. The reason remains unclear.😊

The earliest known example appears in reference 2648. I have found two watches under this reference: the earliest one, with a movement number as low as 12,337,288, was previously owned by @Kyle, and the other example is owned by @gatorcpa. Both early pieces are in 18k gold.

The earliest production also used caliber 352, as seen in the early-production reference 2652 example from @skand, which has a movement number in the 12,430,xxx range.



Within the Globemaster group, I have identified two dial variants:
1. A version with Arabic numerals at 3, 6, 9, and 12
2. The more uncommon arrowhead marker version (the focus of this post)

Across both references (2648 and 2652), I have documented at least eight examples so far—three with a domed dial and the rest with a waffle pattern. The 18k ref. 2652 on the far left belongs to top collector Mike (@MSNWatches). The one on the far left is an 18k ref. 2648, owned by another collector, Evan (@gatorcpa), and is probably the earliest Globemaster to feature arrowhead markers.😍



However, two watches I recently reviewed is likely to be the redial examples. Because for the most correct execution, the minute track next to the hour markers for the reference 2652 should use the circular dots rather than rectangular blocks.
This point was originally discussed in a 2016 thread:



There is also a watch shown in Desmond’s article that raises some questions for me.



Although the photo quality is poor, the applied Omega logo looks unusual. A late-period 2652 can indeed have this later applied logo type—as seen on my own example from the transition batch (2652-15).



However, it contradicts the fact that the watch is fitted with caliber 352, which should indicate an early production period. I also noticed that the text under 6 o’clock may read “SWISS MADE” instead of the expected single “SWISS”.


________________________________________
My Watch:

Reference 2652-10, movement 13,918,xxx
In my view, the case is still in very good condition, especially compared to most gold-cap examples. The thick, flat-feet decagonal crown is original.



Another important detail is the “OXG” stamp on the balance bridge, confirming U.S. market delivery (see highlighted photo).



More close-up photos follow below.
• Note the original applied logo (red arrow)



• Note the thin and delicate font style



• The single “SWISS” at 6 o’clock is faint, which is normal on arrowhead-marker dials



• The two-tone dial remains beautiful under different lighting angles


________________________________________
BOR Bracelet and Buckle

This original two-tone Beads-of-Rice bracelet features the “Presto-Slide Buckle”, which is quite interesting. The inside of the clasp is not stamped 1036 or 8220, but instead marked:
“MADE IN U.S.A. 1/10 14KT G.F. INNER LINKS STAINLESS STEEL”



I am fortunate to have an original U.S.-printed Omega instruction sheet explaining how the buckle works (pictured below).


________________________________________
Dial Variations

There are some differences compared to the example owned by Evan (@gatorcpa). The most obvious ones are:
• The Omega logo shape
• The form of the letter “R” in “CHRONOMETRE”


________________________________________
My Wrist Shots

Below are photos in both indoor and natural light, where the two-tone effect is clearly visible.


________________________________________
Final Notes

If anyone owns—or has seen—another Globemaster example not included here, I would greatly appreciate if you could share it for documentation purposes.

Thank you very much for reading. If you find this research useful, a “like” would be appreciated, and I welcome all comments and discussion. 🙏👍🙏

Best,
Teerapat
Edited:
 
Posts
709
Likes
8,934
It's nice that someone still wants to discover Connie (Globemaster) secrets.
 
Posts
6,008
Likes
9,301
An informative and worthwhile read as ever Teerapat.
👍
 
Posts
2,755
Likes
6,808
Nice write up! Is the bracelet original to the watch? I always thought these were introduced closer to 1955.
 
Posts
6,273
Likes
9,833
Very nice research!
 
Posts
437
Likes
751
Here are two I own:

I have a couple of them:

I bought this one ~ 20 years ago, and IIIRC, the bracelet is original to the watch.


This one is a result of a minor project:

I bought the "guts" and then scavenged a 2648 18k case from another.
 
Posts
4,449
Likes
11,332
Nice watch, looks all correct to me. Here was another 2652 I owned:

 
Posts
2,403
Likes
19,754
Hello fellow members of Omegaforums,

Today, I would like to share my findings on this uncommon “no-name” Constellation, also referred to as the “Globemaster”. This model was produced exclusively for the U.S. market, and due to copyright issues at the time, the word “Constellation” was omitted from the dial.



For background reading, here is Desmond’s excellent article on the subject:
http://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.hk/2006/08/globemaster-son-of-constellation.html?m=1
https://download1648.mediafire.com/...NE2oKrXIw/r6z1f6wcg9qeqfg/Globemasterpost.pdf

From my research, this “no-name” Constellation appears only in gold-cap and 18k solid gold cases. Based on discussions with several collectors and experts, there are no confirmed examples in stainless steel, and no original black dial versions have been observed. The reason remains unclear.😊

The earliest known example appears in reference 2648. I have found two watches under this reference: the earliest one, with a movement number as low as 12,337,288, was previously owned by @Kyle, and the other example is owned by @gatorcpa. Both early pieces are in 18k gold.

The earliest production also used caliber 352, as seen in the early-production reference 2652 example from @skand, which has a movement number in the 12,430,xxx range.



Within the Globemaster group, I have identified two dial variants:
1. A version with Arabic numerals at 3, 6, 9, and 12
2. The more uncommon arrowhead marker version (the focus of this post)

Across both references (2648 and 2652), I have documented at least eight examples so far—three with a domed dial and the rest with a waffle pattern. The 18k ref. 2652 on the far left belongs to top collector Mike (@MSNWatches). The one on the far left is an 18k ref. 2648, owned by another collector, Evan (@gatorcpa), and is probably the earliest Globemaster to feature arrowhead markers.😍



However, two watches I recently reviewed is likely to be the redial examples. Because for the most correct execution, the minute track next to the hour markers for the reference 2652 should use the circular dots rather than rectangular blocks.
This point was originally discussed in a 2016 thread:



There is also a watch shown in Desmond’s article that raises some questions for me.



Although the photo quality is poor, the applied Omega logo looks unusual. A late-period 2652 can indeed have this later applied logo type—as seen on my own example from the transition batch (2652-15).



However, it contradicts the fact that the watch is fitted with caliber 352, which should indicate an early production period. I also noticed that the text under 6 o’clock may read “SWISS MADE” instead of the expected single “SWISS”.


________________________________________
My Watch:

Reference 2652-10, movement 13,918,xxx
In my view, the case is still in very good condition, especially compared to most gold-cap examples. The thick, flat-feet decagonal crown is original.



Another important detail is the “OXG” stamp on the balance bridge, confirming U.S. market delivery (see highlighted photo).



More close-up photos follow below.
• Note the original applied logo (red arrow)



• Note the thin and delicate font style



• The single “SWISS” at 6 o’clock is faint, which is normal on arrowhead-marker dials



• The two-tone dial remains beautiful under different lighting angles


________________________________________
BOR Bracelet and Buckle

This original two-tone Beads-of-Rice bracelet features the “Presto-Slide Buckle”, which is quite interesting. The inside of the clasp is not stamped 1036 or 8220, but instead marked:
“MADE IN U.S.A. 1/10 14KT G.F. INNER LINKS STAINLESS STEEL”



I am fortunate to have an original U.S.-printed Omega instruction sheet explaining how the buckle works (pictured below).


________________________________________
Dial Variations

There are some differences compared to the example owned by Evan (@gatorcpa). The most obvious ones are:
• The Omega logo shape
• The form of the letter “R” in “CHRONOMETRE”


________________________________________
My Wrist Shots

Below are photos in both indoor and natural light, where the two-tone effect is clearly visible.


________________________________________
Final Notes

If anyone owns—or has seen—another Globemaster example not included here, I would greatly appreciate if you could share it for documentation purposes.

Thank you very much for reading. If you find this research useful, a “like” would be appreciated, and I welcome all comments and discussion. 🙏👍🙏

Best,
Teerapat

One of my friends owned this Globemaster . . .



. . . which was fitted with a cal 354 movement. Had the box and original buckle, too.

Art
 
Posts
936
Likes
3,793
Thank you very much for your comments, and also for providing examples of other watches - they are very helpful for compiling additional references.

If I may clarify what I mentioned earlier: the ‘eight examples’ I referred to (not including mine) were only the Globemaster models with “arrowhead markers” in references 2648 and 2652.
 
Posts
936
Likes
3,793
With my limited knowledge, I may have overlooked some details, so experts are welcome to add or correct anything as needed.😀

Regarding the other nice arrowhead example posted by @smorrisonmd, I noticed a small gap around the arrowhead markers, and the word “SWISS” is clearly visible on the dial.

Is it possible that this dial actually belongs to a ref. 2652 and was later fitted into a ref. 2648 case?
The gap around the edge of the dial suggests that it may not be the original fit?

Normally, the SWISS text does not appear on arrowhead dials from ref. 2648, whereas it can be partially seen on examples of ref. 2652.

Since the 2648 case is designed for a dial that is ‘2 mm larger’ than the 2652 dial, this could mean either
(1) a 2652 dial was installed in a 2648 case, or
(2) the bezel of this watch is missing.
(3) Of course, it might be completely correct and I’m just being overly suspicious. 😅

Please compare it with an example watch owned by Evan (@gatorcpa)

 
Posts
13,095
Likes
17,950
Normally, the SWISS text does not appear on arrowhead dials from ref. 2648,

I just looked at my Ref. 2648 and it has “Swiss” on the dial. It is very tiny and partially hidden by the marker, like the Ref. 2652.

I have to hold it at a certain angle and I can only see the reflection of the printing at the bottom of the marker. I would need to remove the crystal and bezel then use a super macro lens to photograph it.

gatorcpa
Edited:
 
Posts
6,641
Likes
11,452
With my limited knowledge, I may have overlooked some details, so experts are welcome to add or correct anything as needed.😀

Regarding the other nice arrowhead example posted by @smorrisonmd, I noticed a small gap around the arrowhead markers, and the word “SWISS” is clearly visible on the dial.

Is it possible that this dial actually belongs to a ref. 2652 and was later fitted into a ref. 2648 case?
The gap around the edge of the dial suggests that it may not be the original fit?

Normally, the SWISS text does not appear on arrowhead dials from ref. 2648, whereas it can be partially seen on examples of ref. 2652.

Since the 2648 case is designed for a dial that is ‘2 mm larger’ than the 2652 dial, this could mean either
(1) a 2652 dial was installed in a 2648 case, or
(2) the bezel of this watch is missing.
(3) Of course, it might be completely correct and I’m just being overly suspicious. 😅

Please compare it with an example watch owned by Evan (@gatorcpa)

I agree that the watch has a 2652 dial in a 2648 case. You can tell from both the diameter of the dial as well as the fonts used which are common to 2652s.
 
Posts
437
Likes
751
With my limited knowledge, I may have overlooked some details, so experts are welcome to add or correct anything as needed.😀

Regarding the other nice arrowhead example posted by @smorrisonmd, I noticed a small gap around the arrowhead markers, and the word “SWISS” is clearly visible on the dial.

Is it possible that this dial actually belongs to a ref. 2652 and was later fitted into a ref. 2648 case?
The gap around the edge of the dial suggests that it may not be the original fit?

Normally, the SWISS text does not appear on arrowhead dials from ref. 2648, whereas it can be partially seen on examples of ref. 2652.

Since the 2648 case is designed for a dial that is ‘2 mm larger’ than the 2652 dial, this could mean either
(1) a 2652 dial was installed in a 2648 case, or
(2) the bezel of this watch is missing.
(3) Of course, it might be completely correct and I’m just being overly suspicious. 😅

Please compare it with an example watch owned by Evan (@gatorcpa)


With my limited knowledge, I may have overlooked some details, so experts are welcome to add or correct anything as needed.😀

Regarding the other nice arrowhead example posted by @smorrisonmd, I noticed a small gap around the arrowhead markers, and the word “SWISS” is clearly visible on the dial.

Is it possible that this dial actually belongs to a ref. 2652 and was later fitted into a ref. 2648 case?
The gap around the edge of the dial suggests that it may not be the original fit?

Normally, the SWISS text does not appear on arrowhead dials from ref. 2648, whereas it can be partially seen on examples of ref. 2652.

Since the 2648 case is designed for a dial that is ‘2 mm larger’ than the 2652 dial, this could mean either
(1) a 2652 dial was installed in a 2648 case, or
(2) the bezel of this watch is missing.
(3) Of course, it might be completely correct and I’m just being overly suspicious. 😅

Please compare it with an example watch owned by Evan (@gatorcpa)


As noted in my original post, the "guts" of this watch were in fact were in fact installed in a "scavenged" 2648 case. Now it seems I need to find a 2652😀.
 
Posts
13,095
Likes
17,950
I would call that a French Seamaster Chronometer.

No relation to a Constellation. Lugs are straight and heavy, similar to Ref. 2520 or 2577.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
709
Likes
8,934
I would call that a French Seamaster Chronometer.

No relation to a Constellation. Lugs are straight and heavy, similar to Ref. 2520 or 2577.
gatorcpa

The screw-down rear cover is similar to the 2652. I asked about this French Globemaster a bit jokingly
 
Posts
13,095
Likes
17,950
I asked about this French Globemaster a bit jokingly
Ref. 2520 has a screwback also.

Sorry for not getting the joke.

gatorcpa