Seamaster 2913 assessment

Posts
705
Likes
990
Hi all!
Here is a 2913 I’m considering going for.
According to the seller, it is an all-original 2913-5 beside the bezel that had to be mostly redone.

Everything seems correct to my eye but I’m not experienced enough to judge the work done on the bezel (by urvintage in Sweden).
The case also seems nice but I cannot really say how polished it might have been in the past…Were these ever sharp?
Movement is a cal500, so for the us market…Is it lower grad?
Nice 7077/6 with it

Anything I’m missing? 😀

thanks!

 
Posts
33,156
Likes
37,888
I've definitely seen a lot of shaper cases than that:


 
Posts
2,658
Likes
3,539
1. Common to find these with either no bezel insert or a redone one, so no issues there.

2. Case has definitely seen many polishes, but again, not uncommon for a watch this age.

3. Cal. 500 is a lower-grade movement, but common for US import watches, as duty was charged partially based on the number of jewels in the movement. Fewer jewels, cheaper to import by the dealer.

4. Lume on the dial looks nice from the photos. That is the best part of the watch.

All in all, I would say it is worth picking up if the price is reasonable - I.e., it isn’t being sold at a mint price premium, but more in line with what it is - a good, vintage watch with a nice dial, worn case, and replaced and non-original bezel insert.
 
Posts
582
Likes
2,636
Anything I’m missing? 😀
If you care about movement serial matching the reference number, I would be careful and take this into consideration. The serial 15182xxx on this one, is way out of range for any 2913's I have observed and especially for a cal 500 reference 2913-5. Only Omega could verify of course, but I very much doubt that this one will match.
 
Posts
462
Likes
459
That the bevel on the case back is too far gone is the nail in the coffin. Both end link #6 are a repo.
 
Posts
705
Likes
990
Thanks for all the enlightening info, it didn’t seem that bad to me 😅
I’ll wait for the next one 😀