Omega Seamaster 600 Technical dial, redial?

M
Posts
7
Likes
0
Hello all,
Have read all that I could find on this type of watch and am beginning to think this is a redial. Any help would be apprieciated. I think type face a bit thick, red line hitting the E in Omega not in line with upright of E and T/T nearly touching second markers. Haven't got pics of crown face.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Ben

omega600.webp Screenshot 2025-11-04 at 10.45.50.webp
 
Mark020
Posts
6,273
Likes
9,833
Redial IMHO. Print too crude
 
JimInOz
Posts
17,465
Likes
36,611
The back has obviously been tarted up with bad brushing.
The dial, while nice (from a distance) looks a bit too heavily printed as @Mark020 noted.

A much better photo of the dial would be needed to convinve me one way or the other, but at the moment, it's a redial.
 
Dan S
Posts
23,127
Likes
51,629
For comparison. I am noticing that the Omega symbol is very different, in additional to bolder printing overall.

IMG_5032.webp
 
M
Posts
7
Likes
0
Dan S Dan S
For comparison. I am noticing that the Omega symbol is very different, in additional to bolder printing overall.

IMG_5032.webp
Thanks for taking the trouble to post pic. All is clear now. Lovely watch, I wish.
 
Davidt
Posts
12,872
Likes
22,252
This reference with technic dial is seen with a range of dials including both ‘old’ and ‘new’ Omega logo, however, this one is a redial.
 
M
Posts
7
Likes
0
M Mr BB
Swisswatchclassics, someone to avoid
Louis, owner of above mentioned has since made good the problem. I couldn't delete the previous text so am posting this one.
 
Sign up or log in to reply...