Omega Geneve

Posts
3
Likes
0
Hi Guys,

I bought this Geneve from a local clock and watch repairer today. The big selling point was the rose gold plated movement inside and the great condition of the watch. Other than a rough date estimate I have little info about the watch and can't seem to find this face style on the internet. Any info you have would be gratefully appreciated.

Thanks
 
Posts
33,160
Likes
37,893
Hi Guys,

I bought this Geneve from a local clock and watch repairer today. The big selling point was the rose gold plated movement inside and the great condition of the watch. Other than a rough date estimate I have little info about the watch and can't seem to find this face style on the internet. Any info you have would be gratefully appreciated.

Thanks
There are a few guys that will know the details, but just to let you know, AFAIK all of those movements in the 500/550 series calibres are copper plated, as mentioned in an excerpt from one of Desmond's essays:

http://users.tpg.com.au/mondodec/movement2.pdf

The early 500 series was manufactured to a standard of engineering and finish only seen in the top-end of today’s market. Cosmetic and functional finishing of the movements was excellent. A combination of sun grinding, snailing and high polish together with anglaged/rounded edges produced an extremely attractive cosmetic effect. As with earlier Omega movements, the 500 series featured copper plating over most of the beryllium bronze alloy parts. The plating was often mistaken for Rose Gold, owing in part to the liberty taken by Omega in describing it as such in some promotional campaigns.

Could you post some more pics of the dial and caseback etc?
 
Posts
33,160
Likes
37,893
Looks like the twin brother of this one, if so its a circa 1965 Omega Geneve with a Calibre 552 movement (non chronometer, one of the strongest of Omega's range) same as my Seamaster 300.

omgenautred.JPG omgenautredm.jpg omgenautredb.JPG
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Ah great it looks like there is a twin one on the other side of the world! With the exception that this is a manual wind.

As someone who is studying marketing its nice to see that some 'twisted' truths were put in by Omega back in the 60's that still live on in regards to the movement plating!!

Ive added a couple more pics below, i'm still chuffed with the condition, thanks for your comments it's reassured me now with my first foray into vintage watches, i'm sure more will follow now in the future.
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,689
It has a 600 series manual wind movement inside, and if I remember I'll get you the case reference when I can check my book. Nice entry into vintage. 👍
 
Posts
243
Likes
330
@jonathan & dsio : mine say hello !!!

this is The one & only Geneve I own..

 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,689
Jonathan: You have a case reference 135.041 with a caliber 601. The watch Ashley (dsio) showed above is a 165.041 caliber 552, and the date versions were 166.041 caliber 565. They're the same watch, with the case numbers assigned according to what type of caliber was inside:

First digit: 1 = man's watch
Second digit: 3 = manual wind center seconds, 6 = automatic wind center seconds
Third digit: 5 = water resistant, 6 = water resistant with calendar

aga79: You have a 145.009 with a caliber 865. That watch had something to do with the 1968 Mexican Olympics, but I don't think it was a limited edition or directly marketed as a commemorative edition. I've got a Seamaster Chronostop 145.007 that I wear more often than I admit to on the forums.

IMG_3415-1.jpg
 
Posts
33,160
Likes
37,893
Jonathan: You have a case reference 135.041 with a caliber 601. The watch Ashley (dsio) showed above is a 165.041 caliber 552, and the date versions were 166.041 caliber 565. They're the same watch, with the case numbers assigned according to what type of caliber was inside:

First digit: 1 = man's watch
Second digit: 3 = manual wind center seconds, 6 = automatic wind center seconds
Third digit: 5 = water resistant, 6 = water resistant with calendar

aga79: You have a 145.009 with a caliber 865. That watch had something to do with the 1968 Mexican Olympics, but I don't think it was a limited edition or directly marketed as a commemorative edition. I've got a Seamaster Chronostop 145.007 that I wear more often than I admit to on the forums.

IMG_3415-1.jpg

Ah! I completely missed the lack of "AUTOMATIC" written on the dial.
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,689
Ah! I completely missed the lack of "AUTOMATIC" written on the dial.

S'alright. We've all been there. It is kind of key for identifying what caliber might be inside though. 😉😜