Is This Jaeger LeCoultre Considered A High-end Watch?

Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
Jaeger-LeCoultre Futurematic Stainless Steel is a high end watch ?
 
Posts
4,200
Likes
10,033
Did they make a Futurematic in stainless? I've only seen it in gold.
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,689
Is this camera any good?

IMG_0012-1.jpg
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,051
Is this camera any good?

IMG_0012-1.jpg
Yes, Canon G-series. Overall pretty good for travel and moderate general photography.😁
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,689
Yes, Canon G-series. Overall pretty good for travel and moderate general photography.😁

No fair - you have inside information! 😜
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,053
ooh a Futurematic Porthole...
@rolokr that's a terrible pic but it's a terrific watch! I would consider this a high-end vintage watch. Not a fan of bumper movements in general, but the ones used by JLC (815, 825, and 817, in this case) are as good as bumper movements can get imo. love the "missing" crown too
 
Posts
13,096
Likes
17,951
Jaeger-LeCoultre Futurematic Stainless Steel is a high end watch ?
I don't need to see any more than that. Here is the E 502 Futurematic in steel from the 1961 JLC catalog:

jlc_image.1841862.jpg

Big pictures can be found here:

http://jlc.watchprosite.com/?show=forumpost&fi=2&pi=4723353&ti=722338&msid=&s=

Production information here:

http://jlc.watchprosite.com/?show=forumpostf&fi=2&pi=1734166&ti=266358&s=0

Note that if your watch contains the cal. 837 movement (with black disk), then it is one of only 500 produced.

I don't have many watches that I consider "grails", but that is one of them.

Here's its American cousin:

Portholefuturematic.jpg

Congratulations on a great find!
gatorcpa
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,053
Note that if your watch contains the cal. 837 movement (with black disk), then it is one of only 500 produced.
gatorcpa

Oops you're right. Cal 837 Nice catch
 
Posts
2,399
Likes
4,473
A rare bird. And I still do not have any luck finding a stainless one. Congrats and dibs!
 
Posts
4,439
Likes
18,250
Did they make a Futurematic in stainless? I've only seen it in gold.
They came in stainless steel as well. At least I have seen several (as in more than one) in stainless. But not with the cal 837... I vote for legit!
 
Posts
1,610
Likes
8,108
High end compared to what? For many, it definitely is. For collectors of vintage Pateks or complicated platinum pieces of various sorts, probably not. Either way, enjoy it and maybe post a legible photo.
 
Posts
4,439
Likes
18,250
High end compared to what? For many, it definitely is. For collectors of vintage Pateks or complicated platinum pieces of various sorts, probably not. Either way, enjoy it and maybe post a legible photo.
I think the label "High End" is more than justified in any context. It is not claiming that it is the highest of the highest on the scale but well above the mean average.
Like a BMW, Merc or Jag may be denoted high end cars, they are not exotic cars like Bentley or Lamborghini.
Patek and extreme complications in my view then are also definitely High End, but also in a separate exotics category.
Just my thoughts....
😉
 
Posts
44
Likes
6
Is this camera any good?

IMG_0012-1.jpg

LOLLLL AHAHA cracked up with my manager next to me



To the poster, a Jaeger is definitely considered higher end than other BRANDS, but is this watch considered higher end in the Jaeger family, not as much. Overall though, it's great! Let's hope your bumper features the 837 movement mentioned above
 
Posts
1,598
Likes
1,074
When this Futurematic was made, who manufactured a better quality movement? I would say Patek Philippe, Vacheron et Constantin (ironically many VC were tweaked LeCoultre-based movements), Audemars Piguet, IWC.
Would you say Rolex was better? More jewels and chronometer rated...
What about our beloved Omega? Maybe a Constellation but not a Seamaster?
What about Zenith? The 135 maybe...
I have always (30 years of collecting) considered LeCoultre the finest of the no-frills/17 jewel unadjusted movements. Definitely top 10 in the day (when the Futurematic was made), even higher/better today.