Film Compax: A Mystery Solved

Verdi
Posts
212
Likes
423
Terrible redial.

I am all in for a good quality redial when the dial is gone and not serving its purpose. If I had a Film-Compax I would spare no dime in getting the best quality work.
While it would be a redial.....it would be the best looking Film-Compax out there, if you know what I mean.

An auction house wanting to make money should have the same approach.
It hurts my eyes looking at that dial.....
 
Mark020
Posts
6,274
Likes
9,833
Possible. If you are an expert at a big auction house and think this is a possible redial I suggest a career switch to second hand car salesman
 
Larry S
Posts
13,459
Likes
52,945
Diabolik Diabolik
Looks like the description has been updated ...

[
Hahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!
 
vujen
Posts
1,044
Likes
3,781
Mark, this one has nothing to do with original Film Compax examples 😉
 
Woops
Posts
548
Likes
2,559
vujen vujen
Mark, this one has nothing to do with original Film Compax examples 😉

But it has an extract from the archives ::facepalm1::
 
Mark020
Posts
6,274
Likes
9,833
vujen vujen
Mark, this one has nothing to do with original Film Compax examples 😉
Why not? Redial it is but 22522 is Film Compax isn’t it?
 
Mark020
Posts
6,274
Likes
9,833
Agreed but if this is one and it has a FC dial it may be a FC 😉
 
vujen
Posts
1,044
Likes
3,781
You take a cheap, destroyed 22522, you reprint a "film compax" dial et voilà! Money! ahah
 
Mark020
Posts
6,274
Likes
9,833
But the extract says so 😁

Anyway: the seller did not want to disclose the serial
Edited:
 
T
Posts
3
Likes
12
vujen vujen
Mark, this one has nothing to do with original Film Compax examples 😉

the serial is 1174502 and movement 261324, it’s correct, but a redial sadly.
 
2 More Posts...
Sign up or log in to reply...