Black Dialed 1940s Tri-Compax? (Phillips Auction)

Posts
466
Likes
1,165
Looks refinished to me. "extremely well preserved and crisp..." 馃槜
 
Posts
754
Likes
2,510
I don't know about the forum consensus but looks a redial to me. And i have many doubts about the hands...
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,053
What an original finish black dial looks like. I can't say anything definitive about the hands, but I have seen two other occasions when these syringe hands were used *shoulder shrug*

 
Posts
13,456
Likes
52,943
Hands ... possible ... page 259. Dial looks refinished.
 
Posts
13,456
Likes
52,943
Guess its caveat emptor with all auction houses.
 
Posts
6,712
Likes
18,569
Pic of the watch under discussion, for posterity and for those who don't care to click through:
 
Posts
220
Likes
314
I'm going with redial. The 3's in the sub dials are rounded, while the ones in the out scale are flat topped. I can't think of a legit dial that had miss matched 3's. Overall it just looks like a mess. Could be wrong though.
 
Posts
2,671
Likes
24,904
I'm going with redial. The 3's in the sub dials are rounded, while the ones in the out scale are flat topped. I can't think of a legit dial that had miss matched 3's. Overall it just looks like a mess. Could be wrong though.
You are not wrong, excerpt from a listing found by @DirtyDozen12

"This is an amazing looking triple-Date moon phase chronograph complication produced my Universal Geneve in the 50鈥檚. The stainless steel case measures 34mm. and displays fine condition. The manual winding and highly complicated UG movement was cleaned and accurate. The black dial was beautifully restored and maintains the original handset. The moon phase aperture retains the original paint and finish. You are going to love it."
 
Posts
238
Likes
932
Always "professionally restored". Makes you go hm?
 
Posts
479
Likes
857
Yes, I agree. The rounded 3s are always a tell tale sign of a refinished dial for this era UG. It's a shame auction houses such as Philips don't spend some of their returns on more thorough research prior to listing.
Is there a forum consensus on black dials from this era? Legit and super rare... or something else?

https://www.phillips.com/detail/UNIVERSAL/CH080117/221[/QUOTE
Is there a forum consensus on black dials from this era? Legit and super rare... or something else?

https://www.phillips.com/detail/UNIVERSAL/CH080117/221
 
Posts
3,472
Likes
8,067
The real question is what helps their bottom line more, disclosure or underdisclosure? Seems like you could make arguments for both.
 
Posts
4,643
Likes
31,220
Yes, I agree. The rounded 3s are always a tell tale sign of a refinished dial for this era UG...

+1. I would also be more comfortable with open 6's and 9's.
 
Posts
255
Likes
315
It could be, and if this is indeed the case then hat off to them, because it would mean that even though they should have done the due diligence to begin with at least they keep their eye open and they are honest enough to admit to errors and rectify them.
A similar thing happened at their last auction with a Zenith gold El Primero chronograph that had a never seen before dial on a gold chronograph (the same as the A386, which is in steel). Also in that case the watch was discussed here and the eventually pulled it from the auction. I honestly think them and Christies are actually quite good and reputable.
 
Posts
69
Likes
150
The lot was pulled after myself and another collector contacted Phillips directly through social media channels. That dial had so many obvious issues its amazing they ever took the piece to begin with.
 
Posts
13,456
Likes
52,943
The lot was pulled after myself and another collector contacted Phillips directly through social media channels. That dial had so many obvious issues its amazing they ever took the piece to begin with.
Why I love these forums. Thanks for saving some fool from him or herself.