For me as long as the component is correct and in new condition, I don't have an issue with it.
Normally I would feel this way, and did with a camera lens adapter, which was a different silkscreen from the one pictured, then again they listed 141 in stock.
What I did not like about this one is the attitude. That it is my fault. Like I am the one trying to defraud the seller. An honest seller would have quickly made good in hopes of future business.
I probably made an honest mistake, but I checked the listing multiple times, and did not see anything fishy. There was nothing in the description stating one item part piece or what ever the weasel word is. There were multiple views of a single object in the listing. I took that to mean that I was purchasing the object photographed. There was nothing in the description other than the eBay boilerplate which stated this was a new item.
There are a lot of sales where there is a low price next to the movement, then a drop down list of single parts. Mostly from sketchy foreign sellers.
While I do not like that type listing, it does make sense, although that seems to be a lot of extra work to sell something. Such listings are useful as they often have one of the tech sheets, which to me are as valuable as anything. Plus as posted in the T17 thread, these are a tool I did not have in the 1990s and I can now sort of trace parts, which have been collecting dust for decades. These tech sheets are also useful to see how a box of associated parts might fit together. I am really looking forward to seeing if I can put that valjoux 203 tripple date moon together. So it is possible I may need other incabloc springs. Although whomever disassembled it put the balance back on the movement. The problem was clearly a broken mainspring, which should be easy to source.
Will be interesting to see what the other eBay bid I did for incabloc springs produces. Those are shipping from the UK and the auction shows three packages. (One package appears to have been opened.) That should arrive next week.
So in effect I am taking a risk on such things as I attempt to navigates parts availability. There are also good chances I am going to break more incabloc springs in other movements, as I recall having done so before. I do have a nice bestfit assortment in the glass vials which is mostly the jewels. I also seem to have a large collection of jewels.
It probably does not help that I am having trouble to get the 650 train bridge to line up. The escape wheel keeps jumping when the next wheel is placed. One would think that these parts having been together for 60 years would do so the same. But I did remove all the dirt, and there could be some wear in the holes. The pinions look good under the microscope (another tool I did not have 20 some years ago.) I demaged everything but there still seems to be some sort of stiction happening.
I am also learning to work with fingercots, something I did not do before. These I cut off from old latex gloves. Surprisingly they do work.
The rodico sort of helps (It is the only way I can keep the movement from jumping out of the holder) There just does not seem to be a clean way to nudge the third wheel without knocking the 4th wheel and escapement out of their holes. The 4th wheel wants to balance on a long arbor, like a clock, so the whole thing tends to act like an inverted pendulum.
Tried turning it over, then the escape wheel wants to wobble on it's long arbor and will not stay still enough for the whole movement to drop onto it.
Been a long day so will give it another try tomorrow.
-j